HRM304 · Session 8 · Reference

Four institutional settings

The same HR move — closing a loss-making plant of 300 people quickly, and bringing in individual performance pay at the surviving sites — runs into very different rules in each country. Read your assigned card.

Your group: answer these four for your setting

  1. Can HR just act — or what is legally required first?
  2. Who must be consulted, and who has to sign off?
  3. What is the worker’s realistic recourse or voice?
  4. One thing the HQ manager wrongly assumes.

Germany

Coordinated market economy
Dismissal & restructuring

Closing a plant is a Betriebsänderung (operational change). In firms above 20 employees the employer must inform and consult the works council and negotiate a balance of interests and a social plan (Sozialplan) that compensates affected workers — the social plan is enforceable. Individual dismissals in firms with more than 10 employees need social justification under the Protection Against Dismissal Act; firms with 10 or fewer regular employees are exempt.

Who must be consulted (voice channel)

The plant-level works council (Betriebsrat). Germany runs a dual system: industry unions bargain sector-wide wages, while works councils co-determine decisions at the plant.

Working time — legal vs accepted
Legal

EU Working Time Directive: average 48h/week incl. overtime, 11h daily rest, at least 4 weeks paid leave. German law caps the day at 8h, up to 10h if the six-month average stays ≤8h.

In practice

Since the EU court ruling (CCOO, 2019) and the Federal Labour Court ruling (2022), employers must record all working time. Implementing legislation is still pending (a draft is expected in 2026).

Worker’s realistic recourse

Strong: works-council co-determination plus an enforceable social plan, and unfair-dismissal claims to the labour courts. Weaker where no works council exists or the firm is below threshold.

What are the most important institutional features here?

codetermination law — the works council — not “German directness.” HR cannot move first.

USA

Liberal market economy
Dismissal & restructuring

At-will employment is the default in nearly every state: an employer may dismiss for any lawful reason, without just cause or notice. For mass layoffs and plant closings, the WARN Act requires covered employers (100+ employees) to give 60 days’ advance written notice (triggered by 50+ affected workers at a single site).

Who must be consulted (voice channel)

No statutory consultation body. WARN requires notice — to affected workers or their union representative, plus state and local officials — not negotiation.

Working time — legal vs accepted
Legal

No federal cap on weekly hours for adults. Overtime must be paid at 1.5× the regular rate after 40h/week for non-exempt staff (FLSA).

In practice

Long hours are lawful as long as overtime is paid. The real constraint is cost, not a ceiling — and salaried “exempt” staff often have neither.

Worker’s realistic recourse

Limited. Union membership was 10.0% in 2025 (5.9% in the private sector), so most workers rely on anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation statutes and the WARN back-pay remedy (up to 60 days).

What are the most important institutional features here?

the near-absence of one. At-will employment plus thin consultation gives HR the most room of the four — and the least built-in worker voice.

China

State-influenced hybrid
Dismissal & restructuring

Economic redundancy is permitted on defined grounds (Labour Contract Law, Art. 41). Cutting 20+ employees or 10%+ of staff requires explaining the plan to the trade union or all employees 30 days in advance and reporting it to the labour administration. Statutory severance (“economic compensation”) is one month’s pay per year of service.

Who must be consulted (voice channel)

The enterprise trade union (or all employees where none exists), under the All-China Federation of Trade Unions. The Trade Union Law (amended 2021) tasks unions with representing and safeguarding workers’ rights through equal consultation and collective contracts.

Working time — legal vs accepted
Legal

Standard 8h/day, 40h/week. Overtime is capped at ≤1h/day ordinarily (≤3h in special cases) and ≤36h/month (Labour Law, Art. 41).

In practice

The “996” schedule (9am–9pm, 6 days) is widespread in tech. The Supreme People’s Court and the labour ministry jointly declared it illegal in 2021. Read the gap as enforcement, not “culture”.

Worker’s realistic recourse

Statutory rights are strong on paper — severance, overtime caps, labour-dispute arbitration. Recourse runs through labour-dispute arbitration and the courts; the union is the consultation counterpart rather than an independent, strike-backed bargainer.

What are the most important institutional features here?

statutory consultation plus collective contracts (the ACFTU process) — distinct from independent, strike-backed bargaining, which is what a Western partner often expects to see.

Brazil

Dependent / emerging
Dismissal & restructuring

Dismissal without just cause is allowed but costly. Throughout employment, the employer deposits 8% of monthly salary into a mandatory savings account (FGTS) held in the worker’s name. On dismissal without cause, the employer must also pay a 40% penalty on the entire accumulated FGTS balance — so a worker who has been there ten years costs far more to dismiss than one who has been there one year. The longer the tenure, the larger the exit bill. Collective dismissals are also expected to involve the relevant union (following the 2017 labour reform and a 2022 Supreme Court ruling).

Who must be consulted (voice channel)

Sectoral unions and collective bargaining, rather than a plant-level works council. Mass dismissals are expected to be negotiated with the relevant union.

Working time — legal vs accepted
Legal

Constitution and Labour Code (CLT): 44h/week, 8h/day, with overtime up to 2h/day paid at a +50% premium minimum.

In practice

Overtime is common; the binding constraint is the premium pay, not a hard ceiling.

Worker’s realistic recourse

In Brazil, collective agreements have historically covered whole sectors by law — not just union members — so bargaining coverage (~70%, 2014) runs far ahead of union membership (~13%, 2019). Recourse runs through specialised labour courts. Pay-transparency reporting applies to firms with 100+ employees (Lei 14.611/2023).

What are the most important institutional features here?

costly statutory dismissal (the FGTS penalty) plus sectoral bargaining — expensive to exit, with voice carried by the union, not a plant council.